I work with a lot of doctors, and they are some of the most capable people I meet. They manage risk for a living, weigh evidence before they act, and follow up when something is left unresolved.

Their own financial planning often gets none of that treatment. Policies bought years apart, money sitting wherever it landed, a plan that was meant to be looked at “once things settle down”. It is a pattern I see in high earners generally, and in medicine it shows up more sharply than anywhere else.

The cause lies in how the career is built.

The years when the habit forms

Medical training is long and exhaustive. Anatomy, pharmacology, running a resuscitation, sitting with a family and saying the thing nobody wants to hear. Personal finance is missing from the syllabus.

The years that follow leave little room to pick it up.

Under the medical Tuition Grant Agreement, a Singapore citizen who reads Medicine at NUS or NTU takes on a five-year service obligation. At Duke-NUS it is four. It begins only after completing PGY1 and registering with the Singapore Medical Council.

Those years run at hours that leave very little over, for many with professional examinations to sit and pay for. Nothing in that arrangement asks a young doctor to think about money. It asks them to survive the roster.

So the financial decisions get deferred, one at a time, to a later that keeps moving. That is a reasonable response to a decade with no bandwidth to spare. The trouble is that the habit of deferring outlasts the decade.

Money is hard to talk about in medicine

This part I hear from doctors directly. Some of my doctor clients have told me that in certain fields, money is close to a taboo subject. Raise it with colleagues, and you may find yourself judged for it.

So it goes unsaid. Doctors will debate a management plan in detail with a colleague, and say nothing at all about what they are paid, what they are charging, or what they have done with any of it.

The cost is that there is nobody to compare notes with. A doctor can go twenty years without once finding out whether their arrangements are ordinary, good or poor.

Why this is a senior doctor’s problem

Most of this gets told as a story about young doctors, and filed as something that sorts itself out later.

It scales.

The consultant fifteen years in often has the same relationship with money the medical officer had. The income is several times larger, while the attention available for it has stayed the same. What has changed is the number of moving parts: policies bought at different points by different people, a mortgage, CPF, a portfolio someone set up years ago, perhaps a private practice, school fees, ageing parents.

More money, more complexity, the same amount of attention available, which is close to none.

And the stakes have inverted. Neglecting a modest income costs a little. Neglecting a large one costs a great deal, because the sums going unexamined are bigger, and the years of compounding not being used are the same years.

This is the unexamined arithmetic of a lot of successful medical careers. The earning problem was solved a long time ago. The other problem never got looked at, because there was never an obvious week in which to look at it.

What changes it

Three things, and none of them require becoming interested in finance.

A benchmark. If money is hard to raise with colleagues, the reference point has to come from outside the profession. A large part of what I do is show people what the alternatives were, set against what they already hold.

One view instead of eleven. A single picture of what exists, what it is doing, and whether the parts contradict each other. It is common to find two policies solving the same problem and nothing at all covering a third.

Someone else holding the list. This gets deferred because it needs sustained attention from a person who has none left at the end of a clinic day. Most of my work is taking that off someone’s plate rather than adding to it.

Where to start

You do not need to have formed a view on markets, or to have done any homework first.

The useful first question is smaller than that. When was the last time anybody looked at all of it together, rather than at one piece at a time, sold by whoever happened to be in front of you?

If the honest answer is that nobody ever has, that is the normal starting point. It reflects a career that asked for everything you had and never once scheduled the conversation.

Sources